When I returned to full time teaching in 2005, schools were abuzz with this new "wonderful" numeracy programme called "Count Me In, Too". CMIT required specially trained staff members to implement the programme, and a huge sum of money spent on resources like counting teddies (in three different sizes and four different colours), laminated feet, number cards, ducks, in short, just about anything you could think of. I remember one staff member from a school I taught in, arriving in the staffroom bleary eyed having sat up past 11pm the previous evening laboriously cutting out and laminating a bucket load of resources for this amazing new programme. As a relative outsider (I was a casual teacher at the time) it seemed a waste of time, resources and money.
When I tried to implement the programme at my new school I was foxed at every turn. There weren't enough resources in the resource room, and as I was last in to the school I was also last into the resource room. You can guess what was left in there. Yeah, pretty much nothing. I ended up wasting my own time, money and resources making these amazing new games. CMIT was all about games. Games and strategies that would "teach" the kids numeracy skills. In my experience the kids were very good at playing the games, but as soon as they were presented with real maths, they baulked. In my opinion CMIT was worse than useless, because all the numeracy time was wasted with playing these ludicrous, resource-ridden games, and none was spent actually teaching the principles of mathematics. As with any whizz bang new programme, the bright kids picked up on the concepts in spite of the programme and the rest were left floundering.
Which brings me to the article I read on news.com.au this morning. Apparently, kids in the upper primary years were failing in their numeracy skills...remembering of course that these are the kids raised on a steady diet of CMIT in the lower and middle primary years. So they introduced a new programme into the schools at enormous cost to help those kids who were failing at upper primary maths (possibly because the counting teddies weren't being used any more). This programme has turned out to also be a failure.
The programme cost each school between $42K and $52K depending on the number of teachers trained.
The maths textbook that I use with our kids is second to none on training them in maths. It caters to the very competent, and it helps the ones who need a bit of a push. The capable kids can work on the book without help from the teacher. The middle group can work on it with a little help, and the teacher could focus on the strugglers without anybody losing out. The textbook costs $15.95 and there are two per grade.
For less than $12000 the whole of Years 3-6 (assuming 3 classes of 30 student per grade) could be supplied with a decent maths textbook, no teacher training required and my money says you'd actually get kids leaving Year 6 who could do maths, not just play games with teddies. Better still, you could get the parents to fork out for half the textbooks and the school could save another $6000. This textbook requires only base-10 blocks, no other teaching resources are needed. That's another saving for the school.
I wish schools would stop chasing after the newest shiny penny and get on with the business of teaching kids.
DISCLAIMER: This is not aimed at my teaching colleagues, who are merely pawns in the bureaucratic system that passes for schooling in 2012. My collegaues work long, thankless, disheartening hours within a system that they have no power to change. These "brilliant ideas" don't come from those working at the chalkface, they come from higher up, and my bile is raised against those higher-ups, not my professional colleagues.
Recent Comments